![]() ![]() The various tools / vendors and configuration options then intersect with various file formats they all combine in a host of unique ways and decisions trees. This is a different discussion with some overlap, but no direct relation to the original question about XMP files. I know little about it nor have a position other than folks here said I should stay raw so I did. I saw this article, seems to argue one pro of DNG is embedded vs. I'm concerned your use of "Embedded Metadata" in this discussion is misleading and inaccurate as XMP and "Embedded Metadata" are not a technical choice relative to options of sharing / maintaining the edit instructions of a RAW file.You might need to define your meaning of "Emb. What I can't do is write edit-instruction data into the RAW file and transfer only the RAW file around. I'm concerned your use of "Embedded Metadata" in this discussion is misleading and inaccurate as XMP and "Embedded Metadata" are not a technical choice relative to options of sharing / maintaining the edit instructions of a RAW file. ![]() If I set LR to continue to maintain the XMP files and I then want to 'share' those edits, I have a few options:Ī) I can send the file and XMP and another LR user could import these, as well as other XMP-reading software, with probably limits of what those other tools can read / understand of Adobe's XMP-embedded data.ī) I can export the edited image from LR into one of a few of transferable formats, including DNG that transfers the image and LR edits as a single importable file, again where the usefulness depends on the target software's ability to use the DNG or another format. These XMP files are recognized when I import the image into LR. I have FastRawViewer, for example, where I can rotate an image and add star / color ratings. The side cars contain descriptors of how to modify the image. DPP's edits are written into that 'header' area, just in a format understood only by DPP. Only the EXIF data can be modified with something like EXIFTool to update / change the EXIF data, that's literally just text in the file 'header', not the image data in the 'body'. The RAW files are proprietary and universally not editable. Other software opening a Canon RAW see only the image data and EXIF and none of DPP's instructions. And even then, Canon's RAW edits are readable only to DPP. I believe the only exception is Canon's DPP that is specific to Canon RAW. None of the 3rd party editors write more / new data into the RAW file. For a RAW file, the only 'embedded metadata' is data that was captured by the camera we call EXIF data. Rather, edit instructions are stored in the tool's proprietary tool / database or a sidecar file (or both). You might need to define your meaning of "Embedded Metadata" to clarify, because 'edit instructions' in general cannot be embedded into the RAW file.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |